A Skeptics Guide to COVID-19

sazrael001
Jan 27, 2021
6 min read

I have decided to write a comprehensive breakdown of why I believe Covid-19 is a hoax and why I believe that all restrictions should be lifted. There is so much information on the internet that I am going to do my best to condense this down and provide the most credible and accurately sourced set of information possible. I want to achieve a standard for people to look to when wanting to know the facts about SARS-COVID 2. I shall begin where it all started, Wuhan. I have a paper from The New England Journal of Medicine called A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia China, 2020. This was done by a group of scientists called the Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team. This paper was rather difficult to find and unless you know exactly what your looking for it will not come up straight away on Google. I found it by searching through various laboratories around the world and the papers they use to base the findings of the supposed new coronavirus on. Without going into the intricacies of the paper if you go to paragraph five of the Discussion subcategory you will see that the team themselves say that they have not fulfilled Koch’s postulates and can only implicate a new coronavirus in the pneumonia like symptoms of patients tested. This in itself is a bombshell as right there you have all the information you need to know that this is all a hoax. Koch’s postulate is the gold standard of knowing whether or not a new pathogen exists and if you cannot meet this standard then you have not successfully proven a new pathogen exists, PERIOD. I am not going to dismember the whole paper here as that would be too lengthy but if they themselves have had to admit it doesn’t meet the specified criteria of being a new virus then that should be enough evidence. This paper was published in February 2020 and from this point forward all laboratories claiming to have isolated the virus have only been taking genetic samples from people and matching them against what was found in this investigation. Thus they are all essentially void. The genetic sequence that Wuhan sent to the labs around the world has an 86% match to SARS-COVID 1, a 96% match to RaTG13 and a 50%+ match to various other viruses such as H1N1 and MERS. There are around 400 nucleotides (these form amino acids) difference between SARS-COVID 1 and SARS-COVID 2. Could this minor difference simply be a mutation of the original strain that has been around for years or could it be a number of unknown corona viruses that have caused respiratory related illnesses before? I have an article from a doctor who proposes it could be one of the unknown pathogens that have been around for some time. Evidence to show that SARS-COVID 2 is merely one of the many viruses in the world can be found in multiple places. This includes influenza rates plummeting, excess death rates staying for the most part negligible and of course what we have talked about; the failure of the original investigation. I have a number of sources showing that influenza rates are at all time lows all over the world. People claim this is because of the restrictions and that Covid 19 numbers still increase because it is more infectious, but without proving it exists, this argument doesn’t really have a leg to stand on. Influenza rates being down shows me that they are being recorded as COVID-19. The excess death rates are provably stable by looking at the figures. I have an Icelandic source an American source and a UK source but with further research I’m sure you will find the same all across the world. America is the best example because out of everyone, this should be the worst. With a reportedly higher infection rate per capita than the rest of the world they should have the highest number of deaths. However a study from the prestigious John Hopkins University shows that there are no excess death rates in any age category for the whole of 2020. In the UK using the ONS figures you will find that in all months leading up to October bar April excess death rates were the same as the previous five year average. After October they were only marginally over and there are a number of factors outside of COVID-19 that could be responsible. There are no excess death rates in Iceland. We are then left with apparent cases of COVID-19. The PCR test does not work over 35 Ct (cycle threshold) and this is what the NHS use as standard. It will pick up anything and everything and at some level we contain the same make up as a star. The parameters they are using to look for COVID-19 are based on 27 base pairs called primers. This is used to pickup on a 27 long base pair sequence in the genetic makeup of COVID-19. Such a small sequence has been found in the human genome itself and as stated previously can be found in a number of different known viruses. This would explain constantly fluctuating infection rates as more testing means more cases of COVID-19 and you can amplify this by increasing the Ct level which more simply put, is magnification of genetic components in a given organism. There is no global standard and this is one reason that explains the varying rates of infection for different countries. On top of this is the change in reporting deaths due to the emergency situation the UK government put the country in. The Control of Diseases Act 1984 enables doctors to report deaths how they see fit. They merely need to presume that a patient died from COVID-19 to legally be able to put them down as a statistic. A death is also put down as COVID-19 when a positive PCR test has been gleaned up to 60 days prior. In conclusion the virus has never been proven to exist, the tests do not work and excess death rates do not show anything like what would be needed to justify the shutdown of the entire world. These three pillars constitute a fundemental basis for any and all arguments against the restrictions imposed due to “COVID-19”, the virus that never was. Everything stated here is credible and can be fact checked and I challenge anybody to find different results. A few extra notes here on everything written above. Electron microscope pictures of the virus are virtually exactly the same as exosomes that the body releases to provide different proteins to different parts of the body. This is a key part of the immune system. The images we have been given by the officials show no distinct characteristics of the virus so this cannot be used as proof. The testing in Wuhan was not credible as they did not have a high enough amount of subjects tested or control patients used. Koch’s postulates have been updated because of the discovery of viruses, so the fact checker status about Koch’s postulates not being able to be fulfilled for viruses, has just been fact checked. Please comment and share and be sure to check out the sources of information below. Thank you and take care,